USMILNET
May 23, 2012, 07:44:10 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
News: Make sure to give suggestions in the Feedback forum. We want this site to be the best it can be for you.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  

WELCOME TO USMILNET
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Navy Uses Electromagnets to Launch Fighter Jet  (Read 1128 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
bill12353
Blaster
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 3333


United States Air Force RET. (Avatar is MMS patch




Ignore
« on: December 25, 2010, 10:10:10 am »

Quote
Navy Uses Electromagnets to Launch Fighter Jet
Published December 24, 2010
| FoxNews.com

A railgun is designed to fire bullets without using explosive charges, relying on the repulsive force of electromagnetism instead. And the Navy has found a way to use that power to propel jet planes, too.
In a test conducted December 18 at a test site in Lakehurst, N.J., Naval Air Systems Command <http://www.navair.navy.mil/> launched an F/A-18E Super Hornet using the power of electromagnets -- a technology the Navy hopes will eventually replace the archaic-sounding steam power currently used to catapult planes from the decks of aircraft carriers.
“I thought the launch went great,” said Lt. Daniel Radocaj, the test pilot from Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 23 who piloted the first plane propelled by the new technology, which the Navy has named Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System, or EMALS.
“I got excited once I was on the catapult, but I went through the same procedures as on a steam catapult. The catapult stroke felt similar to a steam catapult and EMALS met all of the expectations I had.”
Newer, heavier and faster aircraft will require more force to catapult from the carrier decks than steam-powered systems can supply will be able to deliver, and allow for smooth acceleration at both high and low, increasing the carrier’s ability to launch aircraft, the Navy said in a press release.The technology was first tested out by the Navy in 2004 with a full-scale, half-length prototype, where more than 1,500 launches were conducted. The EMALS will be a key element on the next-generation carrier U.S.S. Gerald R. Ford.
Had this newest test failed Wired's Danger Room pointed out the Ford would have to be re-designed to include steam catapults.
The Navy made headlines at the beginning of the month by testing a new weapon also based on railgun technology, which used electromagnetic current to accelerate a non-explosive bullet at several times the speed of sound. The conductive projectile zips along a set of electrically charged parallel rails and out of the barrel at speeds up to Mach 7.
The result: a weapon that can hit a target 100 miles or more away within minutes.
An electromagnetic railgun offers a velocity previously unattainable in a conventional weapon, speeds that are incredibly powerful on their own. In fact, since the projectile doesn't have any explosives itself, it relies upon that kinetic energy to do damage. And at 11 a.m. today, the Navy produced a 33-megajoule firing -- more than three times the previous record set by the Navy in 2008. 



I'm wondering if they will convert the remaining  aircraft carriers since this administration and DOD decided no more new Naval carriers... as well as other sizable ships-of-war will be built in the near future due to cutbacks in military spending, generated by the new socializing agenda of the present administration.
 
Anyway it's good to see some improvements as new technology attempts to push its way in by replacing the old.

Since it seems we can no longer maintain a worldwide military due to expense and indebtedness... it would be very wise to continue to advance systems both at sea and the air to ensure our territorial dominance with up-to-date  systems.  This should also covering aerospace technologies.

Advanced Anti-ballistic missiles systems should be a major priority, in my opinion.
Anti-ballistic missile technology can be used to control countries like Iran, North Korea, along with all the little pestilence others... as well as their larger neighbors seeking the power of the atom.
Logged

"We better be prepared to dominate the skies above the surface of the earth or be prepared to be buried beneath it."
General "Tooey" Spaatz's

"Suppose you were a member of congress. Then suppose you were an idiot. Ahh--but I repeat myself."
Mark Twain
Mudpuppy Sarge
Topic Moderator
Master Blaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5177


Requires Adult Supervision




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2010, 08:51:24 am »

Yes, but how do magnets WORK?!?!?
Logged

The Tinker
Working for a Living is Interfering with My Living!
Blaster
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 3391


Pops was a Gunner's Mate


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2011, 07:52:34 am »

Yes, but how do magnets WORK?!?!?


It's actually pretty simple...use opposing magnetic fields to continually push th eaircraft forward...question i have is how much power does it require and what is the size of the power generation system...
Logged

The One and Only Tink
Mudpuppy Sarge
Topic Moderator
Master Blaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5177


Requires Adult Supervision




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2011, 04:35:04 am »

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/fcking-magnets-how-do-they-work

Wink
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

E-Mail the Administrator

Custom Search

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
SimplePortal 2.1.1
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.241 seconds with 38 queries.